![]() > commas and temperaments, but I really don't think eponyms are much > I know you all think I'm a spoilsport with regard to the naming of The names I've hung on some important temperaments over Paul's cutoff. ![]() Would nevertheless be a good time to bring up is what people think of While we are on the subject of names, a less urgent question which now Subject: Names for important high-complexity temperaments Message: 11104 - Contents - Hide Contents Someone had better ask him if he'd allow it first if Paul likes it I think "keenan" makes sense, though admittedly it isn'tĪs cute a name as armadillo. Thanks for this! I've been promoting "hanson" as the new name forĬatakleismic. > 11 note chain-of-minor-thirds scale * (Wayb.) implies > mapping of, while on the other hand Dave Keenan's page at > calling 7-limit kleismic, paper implies a "catakleismic" 7-limit mapping, 37]]: see - Type Ok * (Wayb.), fig. If 5-limit kleismic is "hanson", what about "keenan" for what we've
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |